She has lived in Morocco for 60 years, yet the Netherlands still doubt that she will return
A 61-year-old Moroccan woman wanted to visit her husband in the Netherlands. Despite having spent nearly 60 years in Morocco, owning a home and having money in her account, the authorities doubt that she will return. The courts have nevertheless just annulled the visa refusal.

The Moroccan woman applied on 22 November 2024 for a short-stay visa to join her husband in the Netherlands. The authorities refused it on three grounds: the conditions of the trip had not been sufficiently established, her resources were deemed insufficient, and her return to Morocco was not sufficiently guaranteed.
To assess this last risk, the authorities examined her social and economic ties to Morocco. This is a criterion that had already played a decisive role in the case of another Moroccan woman whose children remaining in Morocco had ultimately weighed against the visa refusal.
On Bladi.net : Schengen Visas Morocco: 437,000 Approved in 2024
In this new case, the authorities noted that the woman had no children, did not work, and that her husband and several members of her family lived in the Netherlands. She did have a brother in Morocco, but nothing showed that she had to care for a relative or fulfil significant obligations requiring her presence in the Kingdom.
Even the fact that she had lived in Morocco for approximately 60 years was not enough to overturn this assessment.
Even property in Morocco does not guarantee a return
The situation was just as surprising economically. The Moroccan woman had provided documents concerning an apartment in Morocco, her home and a substantial sum available in her bank account.
But the Dutch authorities considered that this did not physically oblige her to return. Property can be managed, rented out or sold remotely, while money held in a bank account remains accessible from abroad. The absence of employment and regular income in Morocco also worked against her.
The Hague District Court upheld this part of the reasoning. In other words, owning property in Morocco does not, by itself, constitute a sufficient guarantee that an applicant will leave the Schengen area before the expiry of her visa.
The Moroccan woman nevertheless raised another, much more personal consequence. Married for nearly seven years, she explained that applying these criteria could prevent her from visiting her husband for a prolonged period. She stated that she did not want to settle in the Netherlands, but simply to obtain a multiple-entry visa allowing her to join him once or twice a year for a few months.
It is precisely on this point that the authorities failed. In its decision of the Hague District Court, issued on 30 March and republished in corrected form on 31 July 2026, the judge noted that the ministry had not explained whether the refusal was proportionate, given the potential impossibility for this woman of visiting her husband.
On Bladi.net : Her French son has supported her for years, but France refuses his mother’s visa
The ministry had also sent no representative to the hearing and had filed no defence brief clarifying its reasoning. The court therefore annulled the decision and ordered it to rule again on the application.
The Moroccan woman did not obtain her visa directly: the doubts about her ties to Morocco remain legally accepted. But the Netherlands will now have to explain whether these doubts genuinely justify preventing her from visiting her husband.